Loading...



Plumbers Business Insurance
plumbingpages.com
features news forums
e-mail   search site:  
 
 
 
 

Temperature and pressure relief valves

 
What is a T&P relief valve and how does it work?

Most consumers take for granted their hot water supply and rarely think about their water heaters once they have been installed. Where water heaters are concerned, "out of sight" is usually "out of mind." and to date, many are unaware of the need to have their water heaters regularly maintained to prevent water heater explosions.

The Temperature and pressure relief valve (T & P) is the primary "back-up" safety measure which prevents the water in the pressurized hot water cylinder from overheating. An explosion of a water heater presumes at least two system failures. Generally, the safety mechanism in the controls, coupled with a properly installed and working T & P relief valve, insures a safe system.

 
 
Watts T&P relief valve for installation on unvented water heaters to prevent the temperature of water exceeding 100°C. Pressed brass body. Ethylene-propylene diaphragm.
  • Pressure setting: 10 bars max (150psi).
  • Temperature setting: 93°/94°C.
  • Wrc approved.
 
To insure their safe operation, water heaters must be installed with temperature and pressure relief valves. A T&P relief valve is a two-in-one safety device, which, as its name implies, responds both to excessive temperature and to excessive pressure in a water heater.

A T&P valve responds to excessive temperature by expansion of the thermostat which lifts the disc off its seat and discharges overheated water, allowing cooler water to enter the tank and replace the discharged hot water in order to moderate the water temperature. When a valve is relieving water in volume, it is generally due to excessive temperature.

 
 
The valve also responds to excessive pressure by discharging water to prevent further pressure increase. If a T&P valve is dripping, rather than relieving in volume, it usually indicates either thermal expansion or debris on the seat, which prevents the valve from closing tightly.

Thermal expansion is an increase in system pressure over that regulated by the reducing valve, check valve or backflow preventor. When water is heated in a closed system, it expands and causes an increase in pressure. When the system is opened, pressure will return to normal, and the relief valve should stop dripping. When a backflow prevention device or check valve is installed on the water service entering a building, a closed system is created. When water is heated, it expands. Because the water has nowhere to go in a closed system, a potentially dangerous situation is created.

 
 
For over a decade it has been known that an inoperative or improperly installed temperature and pressure (T & P) relief valve on a water heater can turn an ordinary water heater into a potentially explosive and life-threatening "bomb."

A safety valve such as a T&P relief valve is a mechanical device which, like any mechanical device, is subject to failure, particularly when tampered with or improperly installed. If the valve cannot do its job, the water in the tank may become superheated (over 212°Fd, causing a thirty gallon water heater to explode with the equivalent force of one pound of dynamite. This is not theory or conjecture. It is a matter of record that such explosions occur, and have occurred, at the expense of human life. Yet, to date, only a few are aware of the need to have their water heaters regularly maintained to prevent water heater explosions.

 
 
The T&P relief valve itself is not the cause of such explosions. Rather, it is the misapplication or malfunction of the valve, which sets the stage for disaster. Plumbing and heating engineers are generally the professionals who install water heaters and safety valves. As professionals who pride themselves on protecting the health and safety of their customers and the public, they are in a position to perform reinspections of T&P relief valves, as well as to persuade building owners, public officials and code bodies that provisions for reinspection should be made for the safety of the public.
 
 
Hot water heater in school kills seven

What follows is an extract from the fire journal report on an incident that took place at the Star elementary school in 1982.

A malfunction of an 85-gallon hot water heater occurred during a lunch period at the Star Elementary School in Spencer, Oklahoma, on January 19, 1982. One corner of the cafeteria was destroyed by the explosion and pieces of concrete block were thrown across the lunchroom. Six children and one teacher were killed and 33 others suffered injuries of varying degrees. The malfunction was caused by overheating of the water in the tank and lack of emergency temperature-relieving capability.

 
 
Two gas-fired water heaters were located in a corner of the kitchen, in a small utility room. The two water heaters were piped in series; the first heater, Heater A, heated water to approximately 160°F for the kitchen, a lavatory in the northwest corner of the kitchen, and a sink on the kitchen side of the lavatory wall. The second heater, Heater B, was supplied from Heater A where the temperature of the water would be boosted to 1800-190°F for use in the rinse cycle of the dishwashing machine. It was the opinion of the investigative team that the burner on the high-temperature heater (Heater B) had fired continuously from the time that the plumber com- pleted his service on the tank, at approximately 11:00 am, until the explosion at 12:15 pm -a time span of about one hour and fifteen minutes.
 
 
The probable cause of the continuous firing of the burner was the failure of the thermostat, because inter nal corrosion within the thermostat had eroded a portion of the seating surface, allowing a small amount of bleed gas to pass through the damaged seat; hence, the leakage of the bleed gas through the thermostat sent a signal to the burner valve to remain in the open position. From information available, this thermostat control was estimated to be 12 to 14 years old.

Markings on screw heads and internal inspection indicated that the thermostat on Heater B had been opened in the field; comments by school maintenance personnel indicated that this was a common practice, the purpose being to recalibrate the thermostat to allow for higher temperature settings.

Testing and internal inspection revealed that the upper temperature limit control was inoperable before the explosion. The Fire officers report concluded that an attempt had been made to adjust the control; mis-alignment of the control spring indicated that the control had ceased to function, since the mechanism would not seal off the flow of bleed gas. This control was also estimated to be 12 to 14 years old.

 
 
The pressure and additional temperature-relief protection for the exploded tank was a combination pressure and temperature-relief valve (commonly called "T&P relief valve" ) in a common housing. After close examination, the investigators determined that the temperature-sensing element had been removed, leaving the T&P valve with no temperature-relief capability. They further discovered that the relief valve had been improperly installed, using a 45° elbow fitting which would have made it impossible to install the valve with the temperature-sensing element in place and properly projecting into the upper six inches of water in the heater.
 
 

The continuous build-up of heat from an uncontrolled burner with no emergency temperature-relief capability resulted in a water temperature above 212°F (i. e. superheated water). When the tank failed, a portion of the superheated water instantly expanded to steam, creating the thrust that propelled the tank pieces and the shock-wave effect identified as the blast, or explosion. Other factors that had some bearing on the accident, either directly or indirectly, were reported by the Fire officer:

  • The investigation revealed that there was no preventive maintenance program in place or in practice.
  • The supervision of maintenance engineers to determine the quality of their work and field practices was inadequate.
  • The lack of in-service training for maintenance engineers permitted practices that were not in the best interests of safety and performance of the equipment.
  • Warehousing of valves and controls at the Maintenance Center was done in a manner that increased the possibility of damage to the parts.

The accident demonstrates the need for a means to prevent temperatures above 212°F in water heaters, because a hazard does not exist if the liquid in a container is at a temperature below its normal boiling point. The missing temperature-relief element, set at 210°F, in the temperature-pressure relief valve would have been one such means. Without this, the high temperature thermostat in the control circuit for the automatic valve was the only such means in place. This was intended to close the valve when the temperature reached 210°F. However, it failed -apparently due to corrosion.